Back to Blog

Monthly Security Review: May 2024

June 1, 2024
4 min read

Security at a Glance 👀

DeFi Exploits

  • Gala Game

On May 20, the private key of a Gala administrator was stolen, and the attacker minted 5 billion GALA tokens, exchanging them for $21M worth of tokens on the blockchain. Subsequent to this, an official report from Gala indicated that the breach involved a third-party contractor and that internal procedures have since been rectified, including the removal of unauthorized users. Following an investigation into internal leads, the attacker's identity was confirmed, and the stolen assets were fully returned.

Official report: Gala News

For project teams, establishing a necessary monitoring system for privileged operations is crucial. Inadequate management of private keys poses severe risks of internal and external attacks gaining admin privileges or access to private keys. In this example, employing Phalcon could have helped avoid losses.

  • Sonne Finance Incident

On May 14, Sonne Finance on Optimism was exploited, resulting in a loss exceeding $20 million. The root cause was a precision loss in Compound V2. Although the Sonne team was aware of this issue and planned to add liquidity during market deployment to avoid the issue, the attacker exploited a flaw. Multiple scheduled transactions in the timelock were left for anyone to execute, and the attacker executed the market deployment without adding liquidity, completing the exploit.

If the Sonne had used Phalcon, they would have detected the attack sooner and limited the loss to $3 million instead of $20 million. Learn more

  • TCH

On May 17, TSC was attacked on the BSC network, suffering losses exceeding $11K due to a signature replay issue. Developers should be aware of at least three types of Signature Malleability:

Due to the characteristics of ECDSA, if (r, s, v) is valid, then (r, secp256k1n-s, 55-v) is also valid, as Ethereum’s ecrecover allows both. To address this, the OpenZeppelin signature library restricts s to be less than secp256k1n/2+1. (OpenZeppelin Contracts)

Regarding the value of v, 0 and 27 mean the same, as do 1 and 28, with 27 being a coding standard. Some libraries convert 0 and 1 to 27 and 28 before verification, but OpenZeppelin currently only supports 27 and 28.

OpenZeppelin previously supported two types of byte signatures, one with v as a separate byte following s, and another with v in the high order of s. (Malleable Signatures)

  • TonUP

A project on the TON chain, TonUP, announced that its staking contract was hacked, planning to allocate funds to buy back 307,264 tokens to compensate users. As new ecosystems bring new opportunities, they also come with the threat of hacks.

🫡 The attack transactions, root causes, and PoC of major attacks in May are all recorded in our Security Incidents list for your review.

Phishing

  • Pink Drainer

The Pink Drainer announced its closure, claiming to have made enough and planning to retire. However, exiting the scene might not be as straightforward as they anticipate.

  • Whale's Address Poisoning Attack

On May 3, a whale suffered an address poisoning attack, losing 1,155 WBTC worth around $70 million. Fortunately, the attacker returned the funds after persistent community efforts. Phishing attacks involve social engineering and can target even the most DeFi experts. Stay vigilant!

On May 15, the U.S. Department of Justice announced the arrest of two brothers for attacking the Ethereum blockchain and stealing $25 million in cryptocurrency. These attackers exploited vulnerabilities in the Flashbot Relay to attack MEV bots. This was a highly sophisticated attack, and our in-depth analysis is available here.

Read the DOJ's press release here.

Blog Article

Phalcon Virtual Experience Journey

😎 Ready for a LIFE-AND-DEATH battle against hackers?

We invite you to participate in the "Phalcon Virtual Experience Journey" for FREE.

Battle against hackers, confront REAL on-chain attacks, and use our automated attack-blocking platform Phalcon to save millions in assets! Are you ready to be a hero?

MetaSuites now supports Solana!

MetaSuites 5.0 Major Upgrade introduces support for Solana, adds cross-site local labels, and enhances DeBank, Arkham, and Merlin Scan! Click here to learn more.

🎉🎉🎉

We are absolutely delighted to share that our esteemed partner, DeFiHackLabs, has been awarded a 35,000 USDT grant from GCC. This funding will serve as their initial operational capital, supporting their relentless efforts in the Web3 security field and nurturing more talent.

Congratulations to DeFiHackLabs on this well-deserved recognition and here's to more groundbreaking achievements together! 👏

Sign up for the latest updates
~$9.4M Lost: Injective, Aquifer Exploits | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$9.4M Lost: Injective, Aquifer Exploits | BlockSec Weekly

During the past week (2026/08/31 - 2026/09/06), four security incidents caused approximately $9.4M in losses across Injective, Solana, Ethereum, and Flow EVM. The largest was the Injective exploit, where an insurance fund identifier collided with a binary options market identifier and the settlement path never compared their denominations, draining about $4.8M; Aquifer on Solana lost about $2.47M because its swap path invoked an unvalidated caller-supplied Token Program, and Notional Finance V1 on Ethereum lost about $1.73M to an unchecked `uint128` cast that valued a debt at zero. Ankr FLOW on Flow EVM closed out the week with about $410K drained through a staking entry point that skipped its pause guard and minted against a stale ratio.

Beyond the Smart Contract: Domain and DNS Operational Security in Web3
Security Insights

Beyond the Smart Contract: Domain and DNS Operational Security in Web3

Contract audits stop at the contract. We ran eight SEAL-based DNS and registrar checks across the 100 domains behind DefiLlama's TVL Top 100 — 800 checks, and only one domain passed them all. Here's which four controls most projects are missing, and why it matters at the user's entry point.

~$23M Lost: Cosmos EVM, Moonwell Exploits | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$23M Lost: Cosmos EVM, Moonwell Exploits | BlockSec Weekly

During the reporting period (2026/08/22 - 2026/08/30), we cover 5 blockchain security incidents totaling approximately $22.7M in losses; an estimated $74M-$119.5M was drained from Tectonic, most of it erased when Cronos was rolled back to its pre-exploit state. The highlight is a six-chain Cosmos EVM exploit series (~$5.7M realized), traced on TAC Chain, where a shared balance-synchronization bug chained an underflow and an overflow to drain a staking pool. The report also analyzes Moonwell's combined collateral-accounting and oracle price manipulation, Tectonic's combined oracle-price and receipt-token exchange-rate manipulation of low-liquidity collateral, an Ajna liquidation business-logic flaw, and a Rain Card Contract Exploit Series with an Ed25519 signature-verification bypass (Avici, Tria, and others) on Solana.

Monthly Security Review: May 2024