Back to Blog

How to Make Blockchain Attacks Blockable: 5 Proven Strategies

Phalcon SecurityCode Auditing
March 7, 2022
3 min read
Key Insights

Stopping a blockchain attack while it is still in progress changes the whole security equation. In DeFi, audits remain important, but audits alone cannot guarantee that every smart contract vulnerability has been removed. That is why more proactive blockchain security matters.

BlockSec has long believed that DeFi security needs more than post-incident analysis. It also needs systems that can detect live threats and take action before the loss spreads. A real-world blocked attack shows that this direction is not theoretical. It is already possible.

In the past few years, the DeFi ecosystem has seen many incidents, including cases where exploited contracts had already been audited by several firms. That does not mean audits are unhelpful. It means audits are one layer of defense, not the entire defense model.

A stronger model combines smart contract review with live monitoring and response. That is how blockchain attacks become more blockable in practice.

The Need for Proactive Blockchain Security

Traditional security work often focuses on finding vulnerabilities before deployment. That is still critical. But once a protocol goes live, the threat model changes. Attackers do not wait for perfect conditions. They test assumptions, exploit timing, and move quickly when they find a path.

That is why DeFi security needs proactive defense. A project should not rely only on discovering what went wrong after an exploit is complete. It should also ask whether it can detect and interrupt an attack while the attack is still happening.

On March 5, 2022 at 04:35:19 PM UTC, BlockSec’s internal system detected a pending attack transaction (0xc161973ed0e43db78763aa178be311733d4ffb77948d824ed00443803d22739c) launched by the attacker wallet (0xC711374BaC07Df9bB9dbAC596451517cEcBf0F0f). The system immediately sent a response transaction (0xf3bd801f5a75ec8177af654374f2901b5ad928abcc0a99432fb5a20981e7bbd1) and successfully blocked the attack.

After that, the rescued tokens were returned through this transaction to the project deployer account (0x67368f4c89dda2a82d12d3a703c32c35ff343bf6).

The rescued amount was not huge compared with losses from major DeFi incidents. But that is not the main point. The real point is that the attack was blocked. That proves a blockchain security solution can move beyond passive monitoring and into active defense.

Get Started with Phalcon Security

Detect every threat, alert what matters, and block attacks.

Try now for free

Enhancing Smart Contract Security and Preventing Attacks

The long-term answer to DeFi security is not one tool. It is a layered security model.

The first layer is prevention. That includes strong architecture review, secure coding practice, and deep assessment of smart contract vulnerabilities before launch. This is where Smart Contract Audit still plays a central role. A strong audit helps reduce risk before code reaches production.

The second layer is live protection. Even well-audited systems can still face risk because of new attack techniques, hidden assumptions, integration errors, or governance edge cases. A proactive monitoring and blocking system helps catch those cases when they appear in the real world.

The third layer is continuous improvement. Every blocked attack, near miss, or exploit analysis helps the ecosystem understand how to prevent blockchain hacks more effectively in the future.

This is also where technical challenges remain. Attack blocking systems still need to improve their success rate, handle different chain models, and adapt to environments beyond traditional execution patterns. But the key takeaway is already clear: blockchain attacks can become more blockable when the right security model is in place.

That direction matters for the whole ecosystem. Projects need more than visibility. They need security systems that can respond when speed matters most.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch

About BlockSec

BlockSec focuses on the security of the blockchain ecosystem and works with leading DeFi projects to secure their products. The team includes top security researchers and experienced experts from both academia and industry.

BlockSec has published multiple blockchain security papers in prestigious conferences, reported several zero-day attacks in DeFi applications, and released detailed analysis reports on high-impact security incidents.

Sign up for the latest updates
Building a Secure Stablecoin Payment Network: BlockSec Partners with Morph
Partnership

Building a Secure Stablecoin Payment Network: BlockSec Partners with Morph

BlockSec has partnered with Morph as an official audit partner for the $150M Morph Payment Accelerator. By offering exclusive discounts on smart contract audits and penetration testing, BlockSec provides institutional-grade security to payment builders, ensuring a safe and resilient foundation for the future of global stablecoin payments.

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Mar 9 – Mar 15, 2026
Security Insights

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Mar 9 – Mar 15, 2026

This BlockSec weekly security report covers eight DeFi attack incidents detected between March 9 and March 15, 2026, across Ethereum and BNB Chain, with total estimated losses of approximately $1.66M. Incidents include a $1.01M AAVE incorrect liquidation caused by oracle misconfiguration, a $242K exploit on the deflationary token MT due to flawed trading restrictions, a $149K exploit on the burn-to-earn protocol DBXen from `_msgSender()` and `msg.sender` inconsistency, and a $131K attack on AM Token exploiting a flawed delayed-burn mechanism. The report provides detailed vulnerability analysis and attack transaction breakdowns for each incident.

Venus Thena (THE) Incident: What Broke and What Was Missed

Venus Thena (THE) Incident: What Broke and What Was Missed

On March 15, 2026, an attacker bypassed the THE (Thena) supply cap on Venus Protocol (BNB Chain) through a donation attack, inflating a collateral position to 3.67x the intended limit and borrowing ~$14.9M in assets. Both sides lost money on-chain: Venus was left with ~$2.15M in bad debt after 254 liquidation bots competed across 8,048 transactions, while the attacker retained only ~$5.2M against a $9.92M investment. This deep dive examines what broke across three lines of defense (exposure limits, collateral valuation, and liquidation) and the monitoring gaps that left months of on-chain warning signals unacted upon.

Get Real-Time Protection with Phalcon Security

Audits alone are not enough. Phalcon Security detects attacks in real time and blocks threats mid-flight.

phalcon security

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch. Aligned with the highest industry security standards.

BlockSec Audit