Uniswap V4 Hook 风险

Uniswap V4 Hook 风险

本系列文章“Uniswap V4 Hook 风险”深入探讨了 Uniswap v4 Hook 机制固有的安全漏洞。

文章全面审视了诸如访问控制缺陷和不当输入验证等关键问题,重点介绍了潜在的漏洞利用方式,并提供了详细的缓解策略。该系列文章是旨在增强基于 Uniswap v4 构建的去中心化金融应用的安全性和完整性的开发人员和安全专业人士的重要资源。

深度解析:全面概述

在本篇文章中,我们首先简要概述了 Uniswap v4 的核心机制,这些机制与 v4 Hook 的安全问题息息相关。随后,我们定义了两种威胁模型,并对其各自的安全问题进行了高层次的讨论。

在本篇文章中,我们探讨了 Hook 交互逻辑中出现的漏洞,特别关注了两种场景:访问控制缺陷和不当输入验证。我们提供了详细的漏洞分析,通过 PoC 展示了潜在的漏洞利用方式,并讨论了可能的缓解策略。我们相信这些见解有助于 Hook 的安全开发和使用,并指导未来漏洞检测的努力。


关于 BlockSec

BlockSec 是一家开创性的区块链安全公司,由一群享誉全球的安全专家于 2021 年创立。公司致力于提升新兴 Web3 世界的安全性和可用性,以促进其大规模采用。为此,BlockSec 提供智能合约和 EVM 链安全审计服务,用于主动安全开发和威胁拦截的 Phalcon 平台,用于资金追踪和调查的 MetaSleuth 平台,以及帮助 Web3 构建者在加密世界高效冲浪的 MetaSuites 扩展。

迄今为止,公司已为 MetaMask、Uniswap Foundation、Compound、Forta 和 PancakeSwap 等 300 多家知名客户提供服务,并从 Matrix Partners、Vitalbridge Capital 和 Fenbushi Capital 等顶尖投资者那里获得了两轮融资,总计数千万美元。

官方网站:https://blocksec.com/

官方 Twitter 账号:https://twitter.com/BlockSecTeam

Sign up for the latest updates
Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Feb 9 – Feb 15, 2026

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Feb 9 – Feb 15, 2026

During the week of February 9 to February 15, 2026, three blockchain security incidents were reported with total losses of ~$657K. All incidents occurred on the BNB Smart Chain and involved flawed business logic in DeFi token contracts. The primary causes included an unchecked balance withdrawal from an intermediary contract that allowed donation-based inflation of a liquidity addition targeted by a sandwich attack, a post-swap deflationary clawback that returned sold tokens to the caller while draining pool reserves to create a repeatable price-manipulation primitive, and a token transfer override that burned tokens directly from a Uniswap V2 pair's balance and force-synced reserves within the same transaction to artificially inflate the token price.

Top 10 "Awesome" Security Incidents in 2025

Top 10 "Awesome" Security Incidents in 2025

To help the community learn from what happened, BlockSec selected ten incidents that stood out most this year. These cases were chosen not only for the scale of loss, but also for the distinct techniques involved, the unexpected twists in execution, and the new or underexplored attack surfaces they revealed.

#10 Panoptic Incident: XOR Linearity Breaks the Position Fingerprint Scheme

#10 Panoptic Incident: XOR Linearity Breaks the Position Fingerprint Scheme

On August 29, 2025, Panoptic disclosed a Cantina bounty finding and confirmed that, with support from Cantina and Seal911, it executed a rescue operation on August 25 to secure roughly $400K in funds. The issue stemmed from a flaw in Panoptic’s position fingerprint calculation algorithm, which could have enabled incorrect position identification and downstream fund risk.