Back to Blog

How to Make Blockchain Attacks Blockable: 5 Proven Strategies

Phalcon SecurityCode Auditing
March 7, 2022
3 min read
Key Insights
  • Audits are essential but insufficient; DeFi needs proactive, real-time defense to stop ongoing attacks.

  • BlockSec demonstrated live detection and on-chain response, successfully blocking an active attack and returning funds.

  • Even audited contracts ca

Stopping a blockchain attack while it is still in progress changes the whole security equation. In DeFi, audits remain important, but audits alone cannot guarantee that every smart contract vulnerability has been removed. That is why more proactive blockchain security matters.

BlockSec has long believed that DeFi security needs more than post-incident analysis. It also needs systems that can detect live threats and take action before the loss spreads. A real-world blocked attack shows that this direction is not theoretical. It is already possible.

In the past few years, the DeFi ecosystem has seen many incidents, including cases where exploited contracts had already been audited by several firms. That does not mean audits are unhelpful. It means audits are one layer of defense, not the entire defense model.

A stronger model combines smart contract review with live monitoring and response. That is how blockchain attacks become more blockable in practice.

The Need for Proactive Blockchain Security

Traditional security work often focuses on finding vulnerabilities before deployment. That is still critical. But once a protocol goes live, the threat model changes. Attackers do not wait for perfect conditions. They test assumptions, exploit timing, and move quickly when they find a path.

That is why DeFi security needs proactive defense. A project should not rely only on discovering what went wrong after an exploit is complete. It should also ask whether it can detect and interrupt an attack while the attack is still happening.

On March 5, 2022 at 04:35:19 PM UTC, BlockSec’s internal system detected a pending attack transaction (0xc161973ed0e43db78763aa178be311733d4ffb77948d824ed00443803d22739c) launched by the attacker wallet (0xC711374BaC07Df9bB9dbAC596451517cEcBf0F0f). The system immediately sent a response transaction (0xf3bd801f5a75ec8177af654374f2901b5ad928abcc0a99432fb5a20981e7bbd1) and successfully blocked the attack.

After that, the rescued tokens were returned through this transaction to the project deployer account (0x67368f4c89dda2a82d12d3a703c32c35ff343bf6).

The rescued amount was not huge compared with losses from major DeFi incidents. But that is not the main point. The real point is that the attack was blocked. That proves a blockchain security solution can move beyond passive monitoring and into active defense.

Get Started with Phalcon Security

Detect every threat, alert what matters, and block attacks.

Try now for free

Enhancing Smart Contract Security and Preventing Attacks

The long-term answer to DeFi security is not one tool. It is a layered security model.

The first layer is prevention. That includes strong architecture review, secure coding practice, and deep assessment of smart contract vulnerabilities before launch. This is where Smart Contract Audit still plays a central role. A strong audit helps reduce risk before code reaches production.

The second layer is live protection. Even well-audited systems can still face risk because of new attack techniques, hidden assumptions, integration errors, or governance edge cases. A proactive monitoring and blocking system helps catch those cases when they appear in the real world.

The third layer is continuous improvement. Every blocked attack, near miss, or exploit analysis helps the ecosystem understand how to prevent blockchain hacks more effectively in the future.

This is also where technical challenges remain. Attack blocking systems still need to improve their success rate, handle different chain models, and adapt to environments beyond traditional execution patterns. But the key takeaway is already clear: blockchain attacks can become more blockable when the right security model is in place.

That direction matters for the whole ecosystem. Projects need more than visibility. They need security systems that can respond when speed matters most.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch

About BlockSec

BlockSec focuses on the security of the blockchain ecosystem and works with leading DeFi projects to secure their products. The team includes top security researchers and experienced experts from both academia and industry.

BlockSec has published multiple blockchain security papers in prestigious conferences, reported several zero-day attacks in DeFi applications, and released detailed analysis reports on high-impact security incidents.

Sign up for the latest updates
Web3 Attack Surfaces: A Penetration Testing Overview
Security Services

Web3 Attack Surfaces: A Penetration Testing Overview

Crypto institutions keep every traditional attack surface and add the money-handling chain on top of it. This article gives testers a practical abstraction of the running system: a four-component model—Application, Authorization and Signing, Blockchain Interaction, and Infrastructure—with each component's responsibility, representative implementations, and inherited attack surfaces. It then structures web3-specific coverage into five attack-surface areas, from production and automation operations through signing intent, approval and withdrawal chains, and fund logic to on-chain transactions and deployed contracts.

~$23M Lost: Cosmos EVM, Moonwell Exploits | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$23M Lost: Cosmos EVM, Moonwell Exploits | BlockSec Weekly

During the reporting period (2026/08/22 - 2026/08/30), we cover 5 blockchain security incidents totaling approximately $22.7M in losses; an estimated $74M-$119.5M was drained from Tectonic, most of it erased when Cronos was rolled back to its pre-exploit state. The highlight is a six-chain Cosmos EVM exploit series (~$5.7M realized), traced on TAC Chain, where a shared balance-synchronization bug chained an underflow and an overflow to drain a staking pool. The report also analyzes Moonwell's combined collateral-accounting and oracle price manipulation, Tectonic's combined oracle-price and receipt-token exchange-rate manipulation of low-liquidity collateral, an Ajna liquidation business-logic flaw, and a Rain Card Contract Exploit Series with an Ed25519 signature-verification bypass (Avici, Tria, and others) on Solana.

Rules of Engagement and Production Safety for Institutional Blockchain Penetration Testing
Security Services

Rules of Engagement and Production Safety for Institutional Blockchain Penetration Testing

A penetration test that touches signing, withdrawal, and ledger systems is prepared before it runs. This article follows the engagement lifecycle: turning a business decision into objective, scope, named owners, and authorized access; recording authority, permitted techniques, operating limits, prohibited activity, communications, and evidence handling in a Rules of Engagement document; and protecting live service with measurable stop criteria, monitoring, change coordination, and named pause authority. It closes with the remediation and retest that turn findings into validated controls.

Get Real-Time Protection with Phalcon Security

Audits alone are not enough. Phalcon Security detects attacks in real time and blocks threats mid-flight.

phalcon security

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch. Aligned with the highest industry security standards.

BlockSec Audit