Back to Blog

DeFi风险缓解指南

July 8, 2024
2 min read

在“DeFi 风险缓解指南”系列中,我们探讨了 DeFi 领域的各种安全问题。文章涵盖了用户遇到的风险类型、评估这些风险的方法、用户的安全建议以及项目团队的安全实践。本系列文章旨在为用户和开发者提供全面的理解,以提高 DeFi 的安全性和效率。

本系列文章摘自 OKX Web3 和 BlockSec 联合策划的《最新逃生策略》(https://www.okx.com/zh-hans/learn/security-special-issue-5),旨在解决 DeFi 用户和 DeFi 项目团队面临的安全问题。

深度解析:全面概述

DeFi 风险缓解指南 01:识别 DeFi 用户面临的风险类型

DeFi 用户面临各种风险,例如智能合约漏洞、网络钓鱼攻击、卷款跑路和市场波动。了解这些风险对于保护资产至关重要。

DeFi 风险缓解指南 02:DeFi 用户如何评估风险并避免损失

在本文中,用户将学习如何阅读和理解审计报告、研究项目团队和历史、分析流动性和代币经济学,并及时了解最新的安全实践,从而有效评估 DeFi 项目中的风险。

DeFi 风险缓解指南 03:DeFi 用户的安全提示

在本文中,我们介绍个人安全措施,例如使用硬件钱包、启用双因素身份验证、定期更新密码以及避免可疑链接或下载,这些措施可以帮助用户保护他们在 DeFi 领域中的资产。

DeFi 风险缓解指南 04:DeFi 项目团队的安全实践

DeFi 项目团队应进行彻底的审计、实施多重签名钱包、建立漏洞赏金计划,并与社区进行透明的沟通,以确保为用户提供一个安全可信的环境。

Sign up for the latest updates
Newsletter - April 2026
Security Insights

Newsletter - April 2026

In April 2026, the DeFi ecosystem experienced three major security incidents. KelpDAO lost ~$290M due to an insecure 1-of-1 DVN bridge configuration exploited via RPC infrastructure compromise, Drift Protocol suffered ~$285M from a multisig governance takeover leveraging Solana's durable nonce mechanism, and Rhea Finance incurred ~$18.4M following a business logic flaw in its margin-trading module that allowed circular swap path manipulatio

~$7.04M Lost: GiddyDefi, Volo Vault & More | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$7.04M Lost: GiddyDefi, Volo Vault & More | BlockSec Weekly

This BlockSec weekly security report covers eight attack incidents detected between April 20 and April 26, 2026, across Ethereum, Avalanche, Sui, Base, HyperLiquid, and MegaETH, with total estimated losses of approximately $7.04M. The highlighted incident is the $1.3M GiddyDefi exploit, where the attacker did not break any cryptography or use a flash loan but simply replayed an existing on-chain EIP-712 signature with the unsigned `aggregator` and `fromToken` fields swapped out for a malicious contract, demonstrating how partial signature coverage turns any historical signature into a generic permit. Other incidents include a $3.5M Volo Vault operator key compromise on Sui, a $1.5M Purrlend privileged-role takeover, a $413K SingularityFinance oracle misconfiguration, a $142.7K Scallop cross-pool index injection, a $72.35K Kipseli Router decimal mismatch, a $50.7K REVLoans (Juicebox) accounting pollution, and a $64K Custom Rebalancer arbitrary-call exploit.

The Decentralization Dilemma: Cascading Risk and Emergency Power in the KelpDAO Crisis
Security Insights

The Decentralization Dilemma: Cascading Risk and Emergency Power in the KelpDAO Crisis

This BlockSec deep-dive analyzes the KelpDAO $290M rsETH cross-chain bridge exploit (April 18, 2026), attributed to the Lazarus Group, tracing a causal chain across three layers: how a single-point DVN dependency enabled the attack, how DeFi composability cascaded the damage through Aave V3 lending markets to freeze WETH liquidity exceeding $6.7B across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle, and Linea, and how the crisis forced decentralized governance to exercise centralized emergency powers. The article examines three parameters that shaped the cascade's severity (LTV, pool depth, and cross-chain deployment count) and provides an exclusive technical breakdown of Arbitrum Security Council's forced state transition, an atomic contract upgrade that moved 30,766 ETH without the holder's signature.