Back to Blog

BlockSec推出Safe{Wallet}安全监控解决方案

March 6, 2025
4 min read

近期 Bybit 事件引起了广泛关注。根据第三方进行的 Bybit 报告,该事件的起因是黑客入侵了一名 Safe 开发者机器,篡改了 Bybit 签名人在交易发起时打算签名的信息,并最终执行了一笔恶意升级交易。该事件导致了近 15 亿美元的资产损失。事实上,去年曾发生过两次类似的攻击,包括 Radiant(损失约 5800 万美元)和印度交易所 WazirX 被盗(损失超过 2 亿美元),这两起事件都是通过 Safe 钱包签名恶意交易造成的。

Dune 的最新数据(3 月 4 日)显示,总共已部署了超过 3914 万个 Safe 钱包,管理着价值 549 亿美元的资产。为了满足用户需求并加强 Safe 钱包使用生命周期内的风险控制,BlockSec 推出了 Safe{Wallet} Monitor。该解决方案为用户提供交易详情、风险评估和交易模拟的全面可见性,有助于保障资产安全并防止潜在损失。

Safe TVL 随时间变化_Dune
Safe TVL 随时间变化_Dune

Safe{Wallet} 交易签名风险

  • 首要攻击目标:Safe 钱包通常管理大量资产,使其成为黑客的首要攻击目标。例如,Bybit 事件是一次精心策划的攻击,黑客提前两天部署并测试了恶意合约。
  • 冗长的安全链:整个操作涉及的安全链非常长。用户需要信任 Safe 的智能合约、官方网站/应用、前后端、自己的电脑、浏览器,以及最终用于签名的钱包。然而,攻击者可以针对 Safe 或个体签名者。任何一个环节的泄露,例如诱骗用户签署伪装成普通转账的升级交易,都可能导致毁灭性的后果。
  • 硬件钱包的局限性:大多数硬件钱包无法解读 Safe 交易。如果用户被 Safe 界面误导,在使用硬件钱包签名时就无法进行交叉验证。加上签名者对先前批准的固有信任,这种“盲签”很容易导致严重的疏忽和安全事件。

Safe{Wallet} Monitor

BlockSec 的 Safe{Wallet} Monitor 实时追踪整个交易签名过程,显示交易详情,识别风险,模拟结果,并提供以下功能:

  • 执行前预警风险:我们的系统对 Safe 钱包交易的所有阶段进行持续监控,包括发起、签名和执行。如果检测到高风险交易,会在签名过程完成和交易广播之前向用户发出警报。
  • 详细的交易洞察:我们的系统会拦截复杂的交易,并将其转化为清晰、易于理解的解释,从而实现知情决策,并消除盲签的风险。
  • 风险分析与执行模拟:我们的系统会分析每笔交易的相关风险,并在执行前模拟交易结果,以防止签署不受欢迎的交易。
安全风险_Safe{Wallet} Monitor
安全风险_Safe{Wallet} Monitor
  • 多渠道验证:可以向签名者和非签名者发送警报,进行额外验证,提供额外的眼睛,并确保彻底的交叉检查。
  • 白名单机制:用户可以将交互限制在特定合约。系统会立即检测配置更改并作出响应。
  • 自动化响应:检测到有害交易时,自动触发预设的响应机制来阻止攻击。

预约演示

任何使用 Safe 钱包的个人或机构,尤其是管理大量资产的交易所、协议、L1/L2 网络、投资机构和投资者,都可能面临资金被盗的风险。

我们诚挚邀请您预约演示,了解 Safe{Wallet} Monitor 如何帮助您预防潜在风险并保护您的资产。

BlockSec Phalcon:威胁监控与预防

Safe{Wallet} Monitor 是 Phalcon 的一个重要模块。Phalcon 是 BlockSec 推出的安全监控和阻止平台,为协议提供全面的上线后安全保护,帮助流动性提供商、DAO、基金经理等保护其资产。除了 Safe{Wallet} Monitor,Phalcon 还包括:

  • 攻击交易的实时监控
  • 操作、交互和财务风险的实时监控
  • 代币数量/价格、关键变量、敏感事件和函数调用的灵活监控
  • 安全专家定制监控解决方案
  • 多签钱包的自动化响应
  • 紧急响应 SOP 和战争室服务
  • 根本原因分析
  • 固定智能合约代码审计
  • ...

结论

在加密世界,安全不是可选项,而是基础。BlockSec 的 Safe{Wallet} Monitor 构建了多层防御,确保每一笔 Safe{Wallet} 交易都能抵御不可预见的风险,从而保护您的资产。

Sign up for the latest updates
The Decentralization Dilemma: Cascading Risk and Emergency Power in the KelpDAO Crisis
Security Insights

The Decentralization Dilemma: Cascading Risk and Emergency Power in the KelpDAO Crisis

This BlockSec deep-dive analyzes the KelpDAO $290M rsETH cross-chain bridge exploit (April 18, 2026), attributed to the Lazarus Group, tracing a causal chain across three layers: how a single-point DVN dependency enabled the attack, how DeFi composability cascaded the damage through Aave V3 lending markets to freeze WETH liquidity exceeding $6.7B across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle, and Linea, and how the crisis forced decentralized governance to exercise centralized emergency powers. The article examines three parameters that shaped the cascade's severity (LTV, pool depth, and cross-chain deployment count) and provides an exclusive technical breakdown of Arbitrum Security Council's forced state transition, an atomic contract upgrade that moved 30,766 ETH without the holder's signature.

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Apr 13 – Apr 19, 2026
Security Insights

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Apr 13 – Apr 19, 2026

This BlockSec weekly security report covers four attack incidents detected between April 13 and April 19, 2026, across multiple chains such as Ethereum, Unichain, Arbitrum, and NEAR, with total estimated losses of approximately $310M. The highlighted incident is the $290M KelpDAO rsETH bridge exploit, where an attacker poisoned the RPC infrastructure of the sole LayerZero DVN to fabricate a cross-chain message, triggering a cascading WETH freeze across five chains and an Arbitrum Security Council forced state transition that raises questions about the actual trust boundaries of decentralized systems. Other incidents include a $242K MMR proof forgery on Hyperbridge, a $1.5M signed integer abuse on Dango, and an $18.4M circular swap path exploit on Rhea Finance's Burrowland protocol.

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Apr 6 – Apr 12, 2026
Security Insights

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Apr 6 – Apr 12, 2026

This BlockSec weekly security report covers four DeFi attack incidents detected between April 6 and April 12, 2026, across Linea, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, and Base, with total estimated losses of approximately $928.6K. Notable incidents include a $517K approval-related exploit where a user mistakenly approved a permissionless SquidMulticall contract enabling arbitrary external calls, a $193K business logic flaw in the HB token's reward-settlement logic that allowed direct AMM reserve manipulation, a $165.6K exploit in Denaria's perpetual DEX caused by a rounding asymmetry compounded with an unsafe cast, and a $53K access control issue in XBITVault caused by an initialization-dependent check that failed open. The report provides detailed vulnerability analysis and attack transaction breakdowns for each incident.