YieldBlox DAO Incident on Stellar: Oracle Misconfiguration Enabled a $10M+ Drain

YieldBlox DAO Incident on Stellar: Oracle Misconfiguration Enabled a $10M+ Drain

On February 22, 2026, a lending pool operated by YieldBlox DAO on Stellar's Blend V2 was exploited, resulting in losses exceeding $10 million.

The attacker manipulated the USTRY/USDC market on SDEX. The pool's configured Reflector oracle path then accepted the manipulated price, overvalued USTRY collateral, and enabled the attacker to drain pool assets (USDC and XLM).

This incident was not a Blend V2 core-contract issue. It was a pool-operator (YieldBlox DAO) configuration issue.

2. Background

On Stellar, Blend V2 is a liquidity protocol that allows users to create isolated lending pools. Each pool defines its own borrow assets, collateral assets, and oracle settings.

In this incident, the affected pool allowed users to borrow XLM and USDC using USTRY as collateral. The pool used the Reflector oracle [2], and USTRY pricing was sourced from the USTRY/USDC market on SDEX [3], with periodic updates.

3. Vulnerability Analysis (Root Cause Analysis)

The exploit was enabled by a pool-side pricing design that relied on a manipulable market.

  1. The USTRY/USDC market on SDEX was very shallow.
  2. The attacker could clear normal orders and place abnormal orders to push the apparent market price sharply higher.
  3. Reflector then updated USTRY to the manipulated value.
  4. The pool's risk logic accepted that value for collateral valuation, which inflated borrow power.

As a result, the attacker used overvalued USTRY collateral to drain borrowable assets from the pool.

4. Attack Analysis

  1. (Tx 1, 2) The attacker manipulated USTRY on SDEX from about $1.06 to about $107 by consuming normal liquidity and placing abnormal orders.
  1. (Tx 3) Reflector pulled the manipulated SDEX price and updated its feed.
  1. (Tx 4, 5) The attacker borrowed 1,000,196e7 USDC with 12,881e7 USTRY collateral.
  1. (Tx 6, 7) The attacker borrowed 6,124,927,810e7 XLM with 14,987,610e7 USTRY collateral.
  1. (Tx 8, 9, 10) The attacker bridged drained assets to Base, BSC, and Ethereum.

5. Loss/Profit Analysis

Estimated total loss was about $10M+ on Stellar.

6. Conclusion

The core issue is straightforward: collateral valuation in this pool depended on a manipulable price source. This was a pool-operator (YieldBlox DAO) configuration failure, not a Blend V2 core-contract flaw. This incident is a reminder that lending pools must select and monitor price dependencies with strong manipulation resistance.

References

[1] YieldBlox DAO

[2] https://reflector.network/

[3] USTRY/USDC Market on the SDEX


About BlockSec

BlockSec is a full-stack blockchain security and crypto compliance provider. We build products and services that help customers to perform code audit (including smart contracts, blockchain and wallets), intercept attacks in real time, analyze incidents, trace illicit funds, and meet AML/CFT obligations, across the full lifecycle of protocols and platforms.

BlockSec has published multiple blockchain security papers in prestigious conferences, reported several zero-day attacks of DeFi applications, blocked multiple hacks to rescue more than 20 million dollars, and secured billions of cryptocurrencies.

Sign up for the latest updates
BlockSec Releases the 2025 Crypto Crime Report

BlockSec Releases the 2025 Crypto Crime Report

This 36-page report, based on data analysis and on-chain evidence, includes breakdowns of common real-world cases, showing the big picture of cryptocurrency crime in 2025. It also covers the main features, structure, and trends in this field.

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Feb 9 – Feb 15, 2026

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Feb 9 – Feb 15, 2026

During the week of February 9 to February 15, 2026, three blockchain security incidents were reported with total losses of ~$657K. All incidents occurred on the BNB Smart Chain and involved flawed business logic in DeFi token contracts. The primary causes included an unchecked balance withdrawal from an intermediary contract that allowed donation-based inflation of a liquidity addition targeted by a sandwich attack, a post-swap deflationary clawback that returned sold tokens to the caller while draining pool reserves to create a repeatable price-manipulation primitive, and a token transfer override that burned tokens directly from a Uniswap V2 pair's balance and force-synced reserves within the same transaction to artificially inflate the token price.

Top 10 "Awesome" Security Incidents in 2025

Top 10 "Awesome" Security Incidents in 2025

To help the community learn from what happened, BlockSec selected ten incidents that stood out most this year. These cases were chosen not only for the scale of loss, but also for the distinct techniques involved, the unexpected twists in execution, and the new or underexplored attack surfaces they revealed.