Get the Crypto Payment Security & Compliance Playbook
Back to Blog

The Initial Analysis of the bZx Security Incident

Code Auditing
November 6, 2021

On Nov 5th, bZX protocol was reported hacked. The attacker drained tokens in the affected smart contracts. After the initial analysis of the attack transactions, we suspect it’s due to the compromised private key of the developer.

Attack process

The process is roughly simple. The privileged function transferOwnership is invoked to transfer the ownership of affected smart contract to a new one, e.g., 0x0acc0e5faa09cb1976237c3a9af3d3d4b2f35fa5. Then the new contract owner can transfer all the tokens that have been approved to the smart contract to arbitrary addresses.

Note that, the privileged function transferOwnership can only be invoked by the current owner of the smart contract. Indeed, we find the caller of this function is 0xb7f72028d9b502dc871c444363a7ac5a52546608, which is the contract creator of the affected smart contract.

We do not know the exact reason why the contract creator transfers the ownership to other addressees. However, we suspect it’s due to the compromised (or leaked) developer private key.

Conclusion

In summary, the security of the private key of DApps is essential to the security of the application, especially for the ones that are not using DAO. We suggest that the project owner can use some new techniques such as confidential computing and MPC to secure the private key.

About BlockSec

BlockSec is a pioneering blockchain security company established in 2021 by a group of globally distinguished security experts. The company is committed to enhancing security and usability for the emerging Web3 world in order to facilitate its mass adoption. To this end, BlockSec provides smart contract and EVM chain security auditing services, the Phalcon platform for security development and blocking threats proactively, the MetaSleuth platform for fund tracking and investigation, and MetaSuites extension for web3 builders surfing efficiently in the crypto world.

To date, the company has served over 300 esteemed clients such as MetaMask, Uniswap Foundation, Compound, Forta, and PancakeSwap, and received tens of millions of US dollars in two rounds of financing from preeminent investors, including Matrix Partners, Vitalbridge Capital, and Fenbushi Capital.

Official website: https://blocksec.com/

Official Twitter account: https://twitter.com/BlockSecTeam

Sign up for the latest updates
~$418M Lost: Bitget, NEAR Intents Exploits | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$418M Lost: Bitget, NEAR Intents Exploits | BlockSec Weekly

This biweekly security report records eight incidents from September 21 to October 4, 2026, with approximately $418.4M in losses across Ethereum, BNB Chain, Solana, Bitcoin, TRON, XRP Ledger, Zcash, Avalanche, NEAR, and related networks. Detailed analysis covers Bitget's $387.5M third-party security product vulnerability and NEAR Intents' $3.87M refund validation flaw and missing state rollback.

Bitget's $387.5M Off-Chain Breach: Beyond Keys and Contracts
Security Insights

Bitget's $387.5M Off-Chain Breach: Beyond Keys and Contracts

On September 24, 2026, attackers exploited a vulnerability in a third-party security product, obtained internal credentials, and forged withdrawal commands. The resulting transfers moved approximately $387.5M from some of Bitget's operational wallets across Ethereum, other EVM networks, XRP Ledger, Zcash, and TRON; private keys and cold wallets remained intact. This deep dive summarizes the disclosed incident path and fund flow, examines rapid conversion into native assets and the ecosystem recovery response, proposes a systematic defense-in-depth framework for institutions, and explains how authorized blockchain penetration testing can validate cross-layer assumptions.

~$11.3M Lost: Multicall Router, Nostra | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$11.3M Lost: Multicall Router, Nostra | BlockSec Weekly

This report, covering 2026/09/14 - 2026/09/20, examines two security incidents with approximately $11.3M in combined losses, on Ethereum and Starknet. In the larger one, a multicall router accepted its own address as a dispatch target, so the nested call reached the Gateway module of a Safe wallet carrying the router's own already-authorized identity instead of the external caller's, and roughly 2,900 `aEthrsETH` was routed out of that wallet into an attacker-created Uniswap v4 pool. On Starknet, Nostra's oracle integration required a minimum of only one aggregated source, so when only two of the three configured price sources reached the aggregation, a manipulated thin-pool quote averaged with a normal quote to value `NSTR` at roughly $49.52, supporting approximately $3.5M of borrowing against overvalued collateral.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch. Aligned with the highest industry security standards.

BlockSec Audit