Back to Blog

Monthly Security Review: March 2024

April 1, 2024
4 min read

Security at a Glance 👀

In March 2024, DeFi exploits resulted in losses of approximately $81 million. Fortunately, thanks to the efforts of all parties involved, most of the funds have been recovered, or negotiations are underway.

  • PrismaFi Exploit Incident

On March 28, PrismaFi on Ethereum was attacked, resulting in a loss of ~$11M. The root cause was Unverified User Input. Notably, the attack was carried out in 10+ transactions, with 2 copycat attackers. The project team managed to Pause the contract through multisig after more than 90 mins after the first attack. Using Phalcon to implement a single-signature emergency pause during this attack could have significantly reduced the losses.

The main attacker has expressed willingness to return the funds, and negotiations with the project team are still ongoing, check the negotiation chats.

  • Munchables Incident

On March 27, assets in Munchables on Blast L2 were drained of $62M. This incident was due to a malicious upgrade implemented by the developers (the contract was not open-sourced). Thankfully, the project team and the Blast L2 core team took action, and the developer returned the funds. Currently, all funds are held in a Safe{wallet} controlled by the Blast L2 Core Team.

Custody Statement; Timeline; Click here to learn more about the incident.

  • ParaSwap Exploit Incident

From March 19 to March 21, several users of ParaSwap were attacked, with total losses of at least $300K. The root cause was an Access Control Issue. It's worth mentioning that the main attacker returned 90% of the assets.

  • Unizen Exploit Incident

On March 08, Unizen on Ethereum and Polygon suffered an exploit resulting in a loss of $2.8 million. The root cause was an Unverified User Input issue. DeFi users should regularly check their approvals and stay vigilant!

Additionally, whitehats sent a rescue transaction on Polygon through bloXroute's Semi-Private RPC, but the rescue transaction was sent to the mempool and got front-run by MEV bots, causing controversy. Read more about this.

  • TGBS Token Exploit Incident

On March 06, TGBS Token on BSC suffered an exploit resulting in a loss of $150K. Interestingly, the changes made by the owner just an hour ago triggered the attack, so it might be another rug pull. Check the alert

  • WooFi Exploit Incident

On March 05, WooFi on Arbitrum suffered an exploit resulting in a loss of $8.75 million. The root cause was a Vulnerable Price Dependency issue. WooFi's lending market was exploited because the price of $Woo was manipulated to be extremely cheap, allowing the exploiter to borrow large amounts of $Woo via flashloan and easily repay it.

Although its price mechanism utilized Chainlink's oracle for price checks, Chainlink on Arbitrum did not provide $Woo's price, failing to prevent the attack. Read the post-mortem report

👉 You can view attack transactions, root cause, and PoC of the above incidents in our Security Incident List.

Blog Articles & Video

How L2 chains can implement several measures to enhance the security of top protocols and protect users' assets on the chain.

Secure your protocol's entire lifecycle with BlockSec. From pre-launch security audits to post-launch attack monitoring and blocking (Phalcon), we've got you covered.

BlockSec CEO Yajin Zhou takes the stage at Open Information House @ ETHDenver 2024 to deliver a pivotal speech titled "BlockSec & the Forefront of Security."

Don't miss this opportunity for an engaging and insightful discussion that promises to shift the way you think about blockchain security.

Partnership

The Blockscout blockchain explorer has integrated MetaSuites' address labels (Ethereum, Polygon, Gnosis, Optimism and Base) and GPT-powered transaction explanation (Ethereum) feature, and has also added quick access to Phalcon Explorer. 🎉🎉

New Site, New Chapter

Exciting news – we've given our website a complete makeover!

At BlockSec, we've got your back, ensuring your protocols are secure every step of the way, from the pre-launch to the post-launch stage! Click here to explore.

Sign up for the latest updates
Newsletter - July 2026
Security Insights

Newsletter - July 2026

July 2026's three largest DeFi incidents totaled approximately $67.9M in losses across Arbitrum and Solana. AFX Trade lost ~$24.15M after a supply chain attack compromised validator signing authority. Ostium's OLP vault was drained of ~$23.75M through compromised oracle infrastructure that submitted attacker-controlled prices. BonkDAO lost ~$20M when an attacker spent $4.4M to acquire enough voting power to pass a malicious treasury transfer with no timelock. All three incidents demonstrate that a protocol's security boundary extends far beyond smart contract code.

~$39.5M Lost: Allbridge, Wanchain & More | BlockSec Weekly
Security Audits

~$39.5M Lost: Allbridge, Wanchain & More | BlockSec Weekly

During the week of July 20-26, 2026, 8 notable security incidents resulted in approximately $39.5M in total losses across Solana, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Zilliqa, and Cardano. The highlighted Allbridge Core incident (~$1.65M) exposed a Solana input validation flaw where the same Pool account was accepted in both swap roles, with analysis reconstructed entirely from the deployed program binary. Other analyzed incidents include Wanchain (~$500K, flawed message encoding in a Cardano bridge validator), Zilliqa (~$400K, flawed nonce generation in a Ledger app since 2019), and Lien Finance (~$542K, flawed validation logic in bond exchange).

What Is Crypto Address Risk Screening: The Four-Step Mechanism Explained

What Is Crypto Address Risk Screening: The Four-Step Mechanism Explained

Crypto address risk screening evaluates a wallet address for AML and CFT risk in a single pass. Learn the four-step mechanism, six risk levels, and seventeen risk indicators that shape the output.