Back to Blog

Monthly Security Review: March 2024

April 1, 2024
4 min read

Security at a Glance 👀

In March 2024, DeFi exploits resulted in losses of approximately $81 million. Fortunately, thanks to the efforts of all parties involved, most of the funds have been recovered, or negotiations are underway.

  • PrismaFi Exploit Incident

On March 28, PrismaFi on Ethereum was attacked, resulting in a loss of ~$11M. The root cause was Unverified User Input. Notably, the attack was carried out in 10+ transactions, with 2 copycat attackers. The project team managed to Pause the contract through multisig after more than 90 mins after the first attack. Using Phalcon to implement a single-signature emergency pause during this attack could have significantly reduced the losses.

The main attacker has expressed willingness to return the funds, and negotiations with the project team are still ongoing, check the negotiation chats.

  • Munchables Incident

On March 27, assets in Munchables on Blast L2 were drained of $62M. This incident was due to a malicious upgrade implemented by the developers (the contract was not open-sourced). Thankfully, the project team and the Blast L2 core team took action, and the developer returned the funds. Currently, all funds are held in a Safe{wallet} controlled by the Blast L2 Core Team.

Custody Statement; Timeline; Click here to learn more about the incident.

  • ParaSwap Exploit Incident

From March 19 to March 21, several users of ParaSwap were attacked, with total losses of at least $300K. The root cause was an Access Control Issue. It's worth mentioning that the main attacker returned 90% of the assets.

  • Unizen Exploit Incident

On March 08, Unizen on Ethereum and Polygon suffered an exploit resulting in a loss of $2.8 million. The root cause was an Unverified User Input issue. DeFi users should regularly check their approvals and stay vigilant!

Additionally, whitehats sent a rescue transaction on Polygon through bloXroute's Semi-Private RPC, but the rescue transaction was sent to the mempool and got front-run by MEV bots, causing controversy. Read more about this.

  • TGBS Token Exploit Incident

On March 06, TGBS Token on BSC suffered an exploit resulting in a loss of $150K. Interestingly, the changes made by the owner just an hour ago triggered the attack, so it might be another rug pull. Check the alert

  • WooFi Exploit Incident

On March 05, WooFi on Arbitrum suffered an exploit resulting in a loss of $8.75 million. The root cause was a Vulnerable Price Dependency issue. WooFi's lending market was exploited because the price of $Woo was manipulated to be extremely cheap, allowing the exploiter to borrow large amounts of $Woo via flashloan and easily repay it.

Although its price mechanism utilized Chainlink's oracle for price checks, Chainlink on Arbitrum did not provide $Woo's price, failing to prevent the attack. Read the post-mortem report

👉 You can view attack transactions, root cause, and PoC of the above incidents in our Security Incident List.

Blog Articles & Video

How L2 chains can implement several measures to enhance the security of top protocols and protect users' assets on the chain.

Secure your protocol's entire lifecycle with BlockSec. From pre-launch security audits to post-launch attack monitoring and blocking (Phalcon), we've got you covered.

BlockSec CEO Yajin Zhou takes the stage at Open Information House @ ETHDenver 2024 to deliver a pivotal speech titled "BlockSec & the Forefront of Security."

Don't miss this opportunity for an engaging and insightful discussion that promises to shift the way you think about blockchain security.

Partnership

The Blockscout blockchain explorer has integrated MetaSuites' address labels (Ethereum, Polygon, Gnosis, Optimism and Base) and GPT-powered transaction explanation (Ethereum) feature, and has also added quick access to Phalcon Explorer. 🎉🎉

New Site, New Chapter

Exciting news – we've given our website a complete makeover!

At BlockSec, we've got your back, ensuring your protocols are secure every step of the way, from the pre-launch to the post-launch stage! Click here to explore.

Sign up for the latest updates
~$4.72M Lost: TAC, Transit Finance & More | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$4.72M Lost: TAC, Transit Finance & More | BlockSec Weekly

This BlockSec weekly security report covers 3 notable attack incidents identified between May 11 and May 17, 2026, across TRON, TON, and Ethereum, with total estimated losses of approximately $4.72M. Three incidents are analyzed in detail: the highlighted $1.88M Transit Finance exploit on TRON, where a deprecated swap bridge contract with lingering token approvals was exploited through arbitrary calldata forwarding; the $2.8M TAC TON-to-EVM bridge exploit caused by missing canonical wallet verification in the jetton deposit flow; and the $46.75K Boost Hook exploit on Ethereum, where spot price manipulation on a Uniswap V4 hook-based perpetual protocol forced the protocol to buy tokens at inflated prices using its own reserves.

~$15.9M Lost: Trusted Volumes, Wasabi & More | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$15.9M Lost: Trusted Volumes, Wasabi & More | BlockSec Weekly

This BlockSec bi-weekly security report covers 11 notable attack incidents identified between April 27 and May 10, 2026, across Sui, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Blast, and Berachain, with total estimated losses of approximately $15.9M. Three incidents are analyzed in detail: the highlighted $1.14M Aftermath Finance exploit on Sui, where a signed/unsigned semantic mismatch in the builder-fee validation allowed an attacker to inject a negative fee that was converted into positive collateral during settlement; the $5.87M Trusted Volumes RFQ authorization mismatch on Ethereum; and the $5.7M Wasabi Protocol infrastructure-to-contract-control compromise across multiple EVM chains.

Newsletter - April 2026
Security Insights

Newsletter - April 2026

In April 2026, the DeFi ecosystem experienced three major security incidents. KelpDAO lost ~$290M due to an insecure 1-of-1 DVN bridge configuration exploited via RPC infrastructure compromise, Drift Protocol suffered ~$285M from a multisig governance takeover leveraging Solana's durable nonce mechanism, and Rhea Finance incurred ~$18.4M following a business logic flaw in its margin-trading module that allowed circular swap path manipulatio