Back to Blog

Our Short Analysis of the Profanity Tool Vulnerability

Code Auditing
September 21, 2022

The Wintermute has been exploited for more than 160M loss. The root cause is that the private key of the Wintermute project was compromised due to a vulnerability in the Profanity tool, which was used by Wintermute to generate the private key and the Ethereum account.

In this blog, we will describe the root cause of the vulnerability in Profanity and how the vulnerability can be exploited.

The Ethereum Address

The Ethereum address is generated from the Keccak-256 hash of the public key and is represented as hexadecimal numbers. The public key is generated from the private key using elliptic curve multiplication, which is irreversible. We can get a public key from a private key. However, we cannot get the private key given a public key, without brute force. Note that the length of the private key is 256 bits. Given a public key, you need at most 2^256 calculation to find the corresponding private key.

In a word, the relationship between the private/public key and the Ethereum address is shown in the following figure.

The Root Cause of the Vulnerability

The purpose of Profanity is to find a special Ethereum address, e.g., the five leading numbers of the address are zero. For this purpose, Profanity takes the following method.

The detailed implementation may be slightly different.

Note that, the length of private_key is 256 bits (2^256 different values). However, there is a vulnerability in generating the private key. Specifically, the seed (in step 1) is only 32 bits, and the process from the seed in step 1 to the private_key in step 2 is deterministic.

What’s the security impact here?

How to Exploit

Let’s say we have an Ethereum address with many valuable assets. If we can get its private key, then we can own this account and transfer all the assets out. However, as previously discussed, we must brute force the whole 2^256 space to find the private key, which is nearly impossible.

But what if the Ethereum address is generated from the Profanity tool? We can brute force to locate the private key with a much lower difficulty. We only need to specify the seed from 0 to 2^32-1 and repeat the same process until we locate the private key that can generate the same public key (and the Ethereum address). Since we only at most 2^32 * loop_threashold calculation. This is doable in a couple of hours or days/weeks if we have a powerful GPU cluster.

However, this is still an optimized algorithm. You can refer to the article from Slowmist for more details.

Takeaway

Making a DeFi project secure is not an easy job. Besides the code audit, we think the community should take a proactive method to monitor the project status, and block the attack before it even takes place.

About BlockSec

BlockSec is a pioneering blockchain security company established in 2021 by a group of globally distinguished security experts. The company is committed to enhancing security and usability for the emerging Web3 world in order to facilitate its mass adoption. To this end, BlockSec provides smart contract and EVM chain security auditing services, the Phalcon platform for security development and blocking threats proactively, the MetaSleuth platform for fund tracking and investigation, and MetaSuites extension for web3 builders surfing efficiently in the crypto world.

To date, the company has served over 300 esteemed clients such as MetaMask, Uniswap Foundation, Compound, Forta, and PancakeSwap, and received tens of millions of US dollars in two rounds of financing from preeminent investors, including Matrix Partners, Vitalbridge Capital, and Fenbushi Capital.

Official website: https://blocksec.com/

Official Twitter account: https://twitter.com/BlockSecTeam

Sign up for the latest updates
Newsletter - July 2026
Security Insights

Newsletter - July 2026

July 2026's three largest DeFi incidents totaled approximately $67.9M in losses across Arbitrum and Solana. AFX Trade lost ~$24.15M after a supply chain attack compromised validator signing authority. Ostium's OLP vault was drained of ~$23.75M through compromised oracle infrastructure that submitted attacker-controlled prices. BonkDAO lost ~$20M when an attacker spent $4.4M to acquire enough voting power to pass a malicious treasury transfer with no timelock. All three incidents demonstrate that a protocol's security boundary extends far beyond smart contract code.

~$39.5M Lost: Allbridge, Wanchain & More | BlockSec Weekly
Security Audits

~$39.5M Lost: Allbridge, Wanchain & More | BlockSec Weekly

During the week of July 20-26, 2026, 8 notable security incidents resulted in approximately $39.5M in total losses across Solana, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Zilliqa, and Cardano. The highlighted Allbridge Core incident (~$1.65M) exposed a Solana input validation flaw where the same Pool account was accepted in both swap roles, with analysis reconstructed entirely from the deployed program binary. Other analyzed incidents include Wanchain (~$500K, flawed message encoding in a Cardano bridge validator), Zilliqa (~$400K, flawed nonce generation in a Ledger app since 2019), and Lien Finance (~$542K, flawed validation logic in bond exchange).

~$1.35M Lost: BarnBridge, DeFiTuna | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$1.35M Lost: BarnBridge, DeFiTuna | BlockSec Weekly

This weekly report covers 2 security incidents from July 13 to July 19, 2026, with approximately $1.35M in total losses on Ethereum and Solana. DeFiTuna, a Solana lending protocol, lost ~$570K because the position health check treated a zero-value position as healthy regardless of outstanding debt; the attacker used controlled swap routing and a separate low-liquidity pool to trigger this defect. BarnBridge lost ~$776K after an attacker exploited the protocol's deprecated but still-active governance system on Ethereum to pass a malicious proposal and drain user-approved USDC.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch. Aligned with the highest industry security standards.

BlockSec Audit