Back to Blog

Oracle Monitoring Feature Now Live in BlockSec Phalcon!

Phalcon
May 26, 2025

In October 2022, Mango Markets lost $116 million due to oracle price manipulation.

In May 2022, Venus lost $11.2 million because of oracle price update delay.

Last July, Rho Markets lost $7.6 million after a contract upgrade led to erroneous oracle pricing.

The truth is, these losses could have been completely avoided. How? Read on.

Oracles: The Lifeline of DeFi Protocols

Oracles, which feed data into blockchains, are foundational to DeFi use cases like lending and derivatives. Yet, many major projects—including Compound, Cream Finance, Mango Markets, Venus, and Rho Markets—have suffered significant losses due to oracle-related attacks.

Imagine you deposit an ETH into a lending platform, expecting to borrow some asset, only to find your collateral valued at over 63 thousand dollars! You might think you've hit the jackpot. For protocol teams, though, this is a nightmare scenario. This actually happened last year on Rho Markets.

Price Anomalies: The Overlooked Fatal Flaw

On July 19, 2024, Rho Markets upgraded its smart contracts to launch a new asset market. However, a misconfiguration in the deployment script caused the BTC and ETH prices from the oracle to be reversed. As a result, the ETH price was erroneously inflated by 20 times, allowing users to borrow massive amounts at a minimal cost—and ultimately leading to $7.6 million in losses.

Key Timeline (UTC):

  • 1️⃣ 08:58:29 (Block 7580110) — The oracle returned the normal ETH price.

If Rho Markets had deployed Phalcon's Oracle Monitors, how would things be different?

👉 👉 Phalcon would have instantly detected the abnormal price and triggered an automated emergency response—completely shutting down any opportunity for an attack.

Phalcon supports oracle price anomaly monitoring:

  • Price Deviation: Monitors the magnitude of oracle price changes and flags abrupt spikes or drops. (e.g., alert if the price changes by more than 200% between two samples)

  • Price Range: Sets acceptable price boundaries. (e.g., alert if price moves outside the $2,380–$4,380 range)

  • Price Mismatch: Compares base oracle's price with a reference oracle. (e.g., alert if prices differ by more than 30%)

Typically, the project team will rigorously check critical configs before contract upgrades or parameter changes. However, in this incident, a manual oversight led to the omission of oracle price checks. Although the lost assets were returned by the MEV bot in this case, such "luck" is rare in most attacks.

In reality, setting up any of the above monitors would have enabled the system to catch abnormal oracle values right away and alert the team through any of the seven supported notification channels. More importantly, manual intervention is often too slow—the time between an anomaly and an exploit can be extremely short (in this case, just one minute). With Phalcon, emergency defenses are triggered automatically, so attacks simply have no chance to happen.

Delays and Failures Can Also Be Deadly

In May 2022, as $LUNA's price continued to plunge, Chainlink's built-in circuit breaker was triggered, causing price updates for $LUNA to pause at $0.107. The Venus protocol failed to notice that in time and continued operating with the outdated price. Four hours later—by the time the team responded—the actual price had dropped to $0.01. During this period, several addresses used $LUNA as collateral to borrow large amounts of assets, resulting in a loss of about $11.2 million for the protocol.

If Venus had deployed Phalcon's Oracle Monitors, how would things be different?

👉 👉 Phalcon supports monitoring for price update delays and oracle health checks—ensuring timely and reliable price feeds. If any anomalies had occurred, the team would have been instantly alerted.

Many projects rely on a single oracle as their price source and lack mechanisms to guard against price anomalies. When things go wrong, attackers profit, users get liquidated, and project reputations take a hit.

Phalcon can monitor both custom and third-party oracles (such as Chainlink and Pyth), providing real-time assurance of price stability and accuracy, preventing liquidation and price manipulation risks.

What's BlockSec Phalcon?

Phalcon seamlessly combines Security Threat Prevention (Security APP) and Compliance Risk Management (Compliance APP), offering users an integrated solution for both security and compliance.

Security APP

🔗 https://blocksec.com/phalcon/security

Delivers comprehensive post-launch protection, including:

  • Real-time attack monitoring
  • Operational, interaction, financial, and custom risk monitoring
  • Safe{Wallet} dynamic protection
  • Flexible monitoring for token prices, amounts, key variables, sensitive events, and function calls
  • Automated emergency response (supports EOA and multi-sig wallets)

Compliance APP

🔗 https://blocksec.com/phalcon/compliance

Screens addresses and monitors transactions in real-time, helping VASPs identify risk exposure and suspicious user activity to meet AML/CFT compliance requirements.

🔥 Try it Now

BlockSec Phalcon now supports 30+ major blockchains, including Ethereum, BSC, Solana, Base, Tron, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Optimism, Manta, Merlin, Mantle, Sei, Bitlayer, Core, BoB, Story, Sonic, Gnosis, and Berachain.

Book a product demo now! Click here or visit the link below. Get started in just 10 seconds—the first 30 sign-ups get a free trial!

🔗 Book a Demo: https://blocksec.com/book-demo

Sign up for the latest updates
The Decentralization Dilemma: Cascading Risk and Emergency Power in the KelpDAO Crisis
Security Insights

The Decentralization Dilemma: Cascading Risk and Emergency Power in the KelpDAO Crisis

This BlockSec deep-dive analyzes the KelpDAO $290M rsETH cross-chain bridge exploit (April 18, 2026), attributed to the Lazarus Group, tracing a causal chain across three layers: how a single-point DVN dependency enabled the attack, how DeFi composability cascaded the damage through Aave V3 lending markets to freeze WETH liquidity exceeding $6.7B across Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle, and Linea, and how the crisis forced decentralized governance to exercise centralized emergency powers. The article examines three parameters that shaped the cascade's severity (LTV, pool depth, and cross-chain deployment count) and provides an exclusive technical breakdown of Arbitrum Security Council's forced state transition, an atomic contract upgrade that moved 30,766 ETH without the holder's signature.

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Apr 13 – Apr 19, 2026
Security Insights

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Apr 13 – Apr 19, 2026

This BlockSec weekly security report covers four attack incidents detected between April 13 and April 19, 2026, across multiple chains such as Ethereum, Unichain, Arbitrum, and NEAR, with total estimated losses of approximately $310M. The highlighted incident is the $290M KelpDAO rsETH bridge exploit, where an attacker poisoned the RPC infrastructure of the sole LayerZero DVN to fabricate a cross-chain message, triggering a cascading WETH freeze across five chains and an Arbitrum Security Council forced state transition that raises questions about the actual trust boundaries of decentralized systems. Other incidents include a $242K MMR proof forgery on Hyperbridge, a $1.5M signed integer abuse on Dango, and an $18.4M circular swap path exploit on Rhea Finance's Burrowland protocol.

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Apr 6 – Apr 12, 2026
Security Insights

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Apr 6 – Apr 12, 2026

This BlockSec weekly security report covers four DeFi attack incidents detected between April 6 and April 12, 2026, across Linea, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, and Base, with total estimated losses of approximately $928.6K. Notable incidents include a $517K approval-related exploit where a user mistakenly approved a permissionless SquidMulticall contract enabling arbitrary external calls, a $193K business logic flaw in the HB token's reward-settlement logic that allowed direct AMM reserve manipulation, a $165.6K exploit in Denaria's perpetual DEX caused by a rounding asymmetry compounded with an unsafe cast, and a $53K access control issue in XBITVault caused by an initialization-dependent check that failed open. The report provides detailed vulnerability analysis and attack transaction breakdowns for each incident.