Back to Blog

Our Short Analysis of the Accusation of the Wintermute Project

Code Auditing
September 27, 2022

By BlockSec

After investigating the report named Analysis of the Wintermute Hack: An Inside Job (the report) published by James Edwards (@libreshash), we believe that the accusation of the Wintermute project is not as solid as the author claimed.

0x1. The privilege of the account 0x0000000fe6a514a32abdcdfcc076c85243de899b

The report just looked up the current state of the account in the mapping variable _setCommonAdmin, however, it is not reasonable because the project may take actions to revoke the admin privilege after knowing the attack.

The storage slot key of _setCommonAdmin[0x0000000fe6a514a32abdcdfcc076c85243de899b] is 0x1488acaeec0884899a8f09209808003200bbe32c28e8f074961d28a1dc78daa1, and we just investigated the storage change in history accordingly. The result shows that the value has been altered twice in the following two transactions:

The first modification just changed the value from 0 to 1, while the second changed the value from 1 to 0, as follows:

Note that the attack analyzed in the report occurred at block 15572515 (0xd2ff7c138d7a4acb78ae613a56465c90703ab839f3c8289c5c0e0d90a8b4ce16), which is in between the first modification and the second one.

Obviously, the second modification of the value means the project just revoked the admin privilege of the account.

0x2. The suspicious activity

The report regarded the following activity as suspicious:

However, it is not as plausible as it claimed. The attacker could monitor the activity of the transferring transactions to achieve the goal. It is not quite weird from a technical point of view. For example, there exist some on-chain MEV-bots which continuously monitor the transactions to make profits.

0x3. Conclusion

In brief, this report is not convincing enough to accuse the Wintermute project.

About BlockSec

BlockSec is a pioneering blockchain security company established in 2021 by a group of globally distinguished security experts. The company is committed to enhancing security and usability for the emerging Web3 world in order to facilitate its mass adoption. To this end, BlockSec provides smart contract and EVM chain security auditing services, the Phalcon platform for security development and blocking threats proactively, the MetaSleuth platform for fund tracking and investigation, and MetaSuites extension for web3 builders surfing efficiently in the crypto world.

To date, the company has served over 300 esteemed clients such as MetaMask, Uniswap Foundation, Compound, Forta, and PancakeSwap, and received tens of millions of US dollars in two rounds of financing from preeminent investors, including Matrix Partners, Vitalbridge Capital, and Fenbushi Capital.

Official website: https://blocksec.com/

Official Twitter account: https://twitter.com/BlockSecTeam

Sign up for the latest updates
COLDCARD Incident: When a Wallet's "Random" Seed Wasn't Random
Security Insights

COLDCARD Incident: When a Wallet's "Random" Seed Wasn't Random

A silent build-and-integration bug in COLDCARD firmware routed Bitcoin seed generation onto a software RNG fallback, whose weak randomness left wallet seeds recoverable offline. Because the weakness is in the seed itself, a firmware update cannot undo it; verified sweeps reached 1,405 BTC (~$91M) by 7 August 2026, with private-channel estimates as high as 2,055 BTC.

~$88M Lost: COLDCARD & LULA Exploits | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$88M Lost: COLDCARD & LULA Exploits | BlockSec Weekly

During the week of July 27 to August 2, 2026, two notable security incidents caused roughly $88M in losses across Bitcoin and BNB Chain. The highlighted COLDCARD incident was a hardware-wallet firmware entropy failure: a build guard that checked whether an RNG configuration macro existed rather than whether it was enabled routed seed generation to a deterministic software fallback, enabling an attacker to recover affected seeds and sweep at least 1,370 BTC (~$88M) across a series of on-chain waves. The LULA token on BNB Chain lost ~$578K to a business-logic flaw where an attacker-reachable path could trigger its privileged `recycle()` function, pulling LULA out of a PancakeSwap V2 pair, resyncing its reserves to the manipulated balance, and draining its liquidity.

Newsletter - July 2026
Security Insights

Newsletter - July 2026

July 2026's three largest DeFi incidents totaled approximately $67.9M in losses across Arbitrum and Solana. AFX Trade lost ~$24.15M after a supply chain attack compromised validator signing authority. Ostium's OLP vault was drained of ~$23.75M through compromised oracle infrastructure that submitted attacker-controlled prices. BonkDAO lost ~$20M when an attacker spent $4.4M to acquire enough voting power to pass a malicious treasury transfer with no timelock. All three incidents demonstrate that a protocol's security boundary extends far beyond smart contract code.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch. Aligned with the highest industry security standards.

BlockSec Audit