Get the Crypto Payment Security & Compliance Playbook
Back to Blog

Lead in: DeFi Risk Mitigation Guide

July 8, 2024
2 min read

In the "DeFi Risk Mitigation Guide" series, various security issues within the DeFi are explored. The articles include types of risks users encounter, methods to assess these risks, safety recommendations for users, and security practices for project teams. The series of articles offering users and developers a comprehensive understanding to improve security and efficiency in the DeFi.

This series of articles, excerpted from the Latest Escape Strategy (https://www.okx.com/zh-hans/learn/security-special-issue-5)co-curated by OKX Web3 and BlockSec, addresses the security concerns faced by DeFi users and DeFi project teams.

Breaking Down: A Comprehensive Overview

DeFi Risk Mitigation Guide 01 : Identifying Types of Risks DeFi Users Face

DeFi users face various risks such as smart contract vulnerabilities, phishing attacks, rug pulls, and market volatility. Understanding these risks is crucial for safeguarding assets.

DeFi Risk Mitigation Guide 02 : How DeFi Users Can Assess Risks and Avoid Losses

In this article, Users will learn to read and understand audit reports, research the project's team and history, analyze liquidity and tokenomics, and stay updated with the latest security practices to effectively assess risks in DeFi projects.

DeFiRisk Mitigation Guide 03 : Safety Tips for DeFi Users

In this article, we introduce personal security measures such as using hardware wallets, enabling two-factor authentication, regularly updating passwords, and avoiding suspicious links or downloads can help users protect their assets in the DeFi space.

DeFi Risk Mitigation Guide 04 : Security Practices for DeFi Project Teams

DeFi project teams should conduct thorough audits, implement multi-signature wallets, establish bug bounty programs, and engage with the community transparently to ensure a secure and trustworthy environment for users.

Sign up for the latest updates
Web3 Attack Surfaces: A Penetration Testing Overview
Security Services

Web3 Attack Surfaces: A Penetration Testing Overview

Crypto institutions keep every traditional attack surface and add the money-handling chain on top of it. This article gives testers a practical abstraction of the running system: a four-component model—Application, Authorization and Signing, Blockchain Interaction, and Infrastructure—with each component's responsibility, representative implementations, and inherited attack surfaces. It then structures web3-specific coverage into five attack-surface areas, from production and automation operations through signing intent, approval and withdrawal chains, and fund logic to on-chain transactions and deployed contracts.

~$23M Lost: Cosmos EVM, Moonwell Exploits | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$23M Lost: Cosmos EVM, Moonwell Exploits | BlockSec Weekly

During the reporting period (2026/08/22 - 2026/08/30), we cover 5 blockchain security incidents totaling approximately $22.7M in losses; an estimated $74M-$119.5M was drained from Tectonic, most of it erased when Cronos was rolled back to its pre-exploit state. The highlight is a six-chain Cosmos EVM exploit series (~$5.7M realized), traced on TAC Chain, where a shared balance-synchronization bug chained an underflow and an overflow to drain a staking pool. The report also analyzes Moonwell's combined collateral-accounting and oracle price manipulation, Tectonic's combined oracle-price and receipt-token exchange-rate manipulation of low-liquidity collateral, an Ajna liquidation business-logic flaw, and a Rain Card Contract Exploit Series with an Ed25519 signature-verification bypass (Avici, Tria, and others) on Solana.

Rules of Engagement and Production Safety for Institutional Blockchain Penetration Testing
Security Services

Rules of Engagement and Production Safety for Institutional Blockchain Penetration Testing

A penetration test that touches signing, withdrawal, and ledger systems is prepared before it runs. This article follows the engagement lifecycle: turning a business decision into objective, scope, named owners, and authorized access; recording authority, permitted techniques, operating limits, prohibited activity, communications, and evidence handling in a Rules of Engagement document; and protecting live service with measurable stop criteria, monitoring, change coordination, and named pause authority. It closes with the remediation and retest that turn findings into validated controls.

Lead in: DeFi Risk Mitigation Guide