Get the Crypto Payment Security & Compliance Playbook
Back to Blog

Flash Loan Attack on Plouto Vault

Code Auditing
December 18, 2020

The blog is published by BlockSec Team, Zhejiang University, China

On 16th Dec 2020, our monitoring system ThunderForecast reported a series of suspicious transactions. Then, we used the EthScope system developed by our research team to analyze these transactions and confirmed that all reported transactions are malicious. In this blog, we illustrate the attack with rich details to help understand the intention of each behaviour of the attacker.

What is Plouto Vault?

Plouto is an open decentralized asset management protocol. Plouto protocol comes up with a key idea called “Open Vault”. With this idea, except standard investing strategies, asset managers can also deploy their protocol with other third parties or even design their own strategies with Plouto Vault. In this attack, the attacker leveraged Plouto Vault’s vulnerability that the minting token amount depends on the corresponding token amount at the YPool. Finally, the attacker arb out a total of 698,775.32 USD.

Details

We now start revealing more details of this attack with one attack transaction 0x49112d…

There are ten steps involved：

  • Step 1: Take a flash loan of 9,000,000 USDC from AAVE.
  • Step 3: Take a flash loan of 2,000,000 USDT from UniswapV2.
  • Step 7: Return 2,006,200 USDT flash loan lent on UniswapV2.
  • Step 8: Swap 17,298 USDT to 17,320 USDC at the UniswapV2-USDT pool. The exchanged USDC is used to pay back the first flash loan lent on AAVE.
  • Step 9: Return 9,008,100 USDC flash loan lent on AAVE.
  • Step 10: Swap 177,533 USDC to 175,669 DAI and send the profit to the attacker’s EOA.

Gain&Loss

In the transaction mentioned above, the attacker manipulates the liquidity of USDT at the YPool and arb out 175,669 DAI from Plouto Vault.

The scale of the attack

Based on the feature of the attack, we detect 1 malicious contract 0x2421ce… and 8 transactions(The largest profit gained in transaction 0x49112d… event reaches 175,669.88 USD) launched by the attacker 0x43c162…. According to the data on Ehterscan, The attacker arb out a total of 698,775.32 USD.

The End

With the development of the DeFi ecosystem on Ethereum and the continuous updating of DeFi services (Flash Loan), security issues have gradually become prominent. Behind this attack, Flash Loan provided a lot of “convenience” for the attacker to implement liquidity manipulation. Recently, Harvest platform suffered from an attack which leverages a strong dependency between contracts.

Timeline

  • 2020/12/16: Found suspicious transactions
  • 2020/12/17: Finished the analysis
  • 2020/12/18: Details were released

About BlockSec

BlockSec is a pioneering blockchain security company established in 2021 by a group of globally distinguished security experts. The company is committed to enhancing security and usability for the emerging Web3 world in order to facilitate its mass adoption. To this end, BlockSec provides smart contract and EVM chain security auditing services, the Phalcon platform for security development and blocking threats proactively, the MetaSleuth platform for fund tracking and investigation, and MetaSuites extension for web3 builders surfing efficiently in the crypto world.

To date, the company has served over 300 esteemed clients such as MetaMask, Uniswap Foundation, Compound, Forta, and PancakeSwap, and received tens of millions of US dollars in two rounds of financing from preeminent investors, including Matrix Partners, Vitalbridge Capital, and Fenbushi Capital.

Official website: https://blocksec.com/

Official Twitter account: https://twitter.com/BlockSecTeam

Sign up for the latest updates
~$10.26M Lost: Term Finance, MAYAChain | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$10.26M Lost: Term Finance, MAYAChain | BlockSec Weekly

During the week of August 17-23, 2026, two notable security incidents resulted in approximately $10.26M in total losses across Ethereum and MAYAChain. The highlighted Term Finance incident (~$8.5M) was a flawed governance design rather than a coding bug: each vault ships its own on-chain DAO whose support-threshold and participation checks are purely relative, with no absolute floor; with almost no one taking part in governance, there was no electorate to vote a proposal down and no guardian to cancel one, so an attacker acquired a supermajority of a vault's voting power for roughly 0.5 ETH and, after the execution delay elapsed, drained six of Term's vaults for approximately $8.5M in total. MAYAChain (~$1.76M) lost funds to a chain of accounting and state-validation defects, where a single crafted deposit made valid withdrawals appear to have failed, triggered a recovery path that inflated a low-liquidity pool's recorded native-token balance with no real backing, and let the attacker drain the inflated value by adding and withdrawing liquidity.

Harmony Cross-Shard ONE Mint + ~$47M Key Losses | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

Harmony Cross-Shard ONE Mint + ~$47M Key Losses | BlockSec Weekly

During the week of August 10-16, 2026, 5 notable security incidents are featured, involving approximately $47M in quantified losses, with the detailed analysis focused on a chain-implementation flaw in the Harmony Layer-1. Harmony suffered unauthorized minting of native ONE through a cross-shard receipt replay: destination shards derived the receipt spent-marker from unauthenticated MerkleProof.ShardID and BlockNum fields instead of the signed source header, so an already-credited receipt could be replayed with no matching source-shard debit. Approximately 3.01T ONE was forged, but its nominal value far exceeds the token's market capitalization and is neither realizable nor confirmed realized loss, so Harmony is excluded from the total; the ~$47M came from private-key compromises (Unknown Whale Wallet ~$25M, Kite ~$14M, and Coinsbuy ~$7.9M) plus a Fox business-logic flaw (~$117K).

~$1.6M Lost: Moke Token, LpdFi Exploits | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$1.6M Lost: Moke Token, LpdFi Exploits | BlockSec Weekly

During the week of August 3-9, 2026, 2 notable security incidents on BNB Chain resulted in approximately $1.6M in total losses, both from price manipulation. The highlighted LpdFi incident (~$697K) reused the same manipulable PancakeSwap pair reserves for both order valuation and interest redemption, letting the attacker inflate a position's principal and reshape the pool to redeem an oversized interest claim. Moke Token (~$906K) combined a manipulable spot price with duplicated LP dividend accounting to claim inflated MOKE and collect the resulting BNB dividends multiple times.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch. Aligned with the highest industry security standards.

BlockSec Audit
Flash Loan Attack on Plouto Vault