Back to Blog

DeFi Exploit Analysis: The Root Cause of Euler's $200M Loss

Code Auditing
March 13, 2023
3 min read
Key Insights
  • Mar 13, 2023: Euler Finance on Ethereum lost ~$200M in a flash-loan exploit caused by a missing liquidity/health check in donateToReserves() (business logic flaw).

  • Attacker abused self-borrow and soft liquidation: minted massive eDAI/dDAI leverage, re

On March 13, 2023, Euler Finance, a decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol on Ethereum, experienced a flash loan attack resulting in losses of approximately $200 million. The root cause was identified as the absence of a liquidity check in the donateToReserves() function. As a blockchain security company, BlockSec continuously monitors such exploits to improve DeFi security and protect digital assets.

Date Attack Type Chain Lost Recovered
2023-03-13 Business Logic Flaw ETH ~$200M Yes

Euler Finance was ranked among the top 30 DeFi protocols on DefiLlama before the attack. Its total value locked (TVL) dropped dramatically from $264 million to $10 million, a 96% decline.

Key Concepts

Understanding Euler Finance’s self-borrow and soft liquidation mechanisms is essential to grasp the exploit:

  • Self-borrow: Allows users to mint new assets and increase debt by using newly minted EToken as collateral, effectively enabling leverage.
  • Soft liquidation: Permits liquidators to repay debt flexibly for the liquidated party, rather than using a fixed liquidation coefficient.

These mechanisms, while innovative, introduced exploitable vulnerabilities that the attacker leveraged.

Attack Analysis

The attacker executed the exploit through the following steps:

  1. Flashloaned 30M DAI from AAVE.
  2. Deposited 20M DAI into Euler Finance and received 20M eDAI.
  3. Leveraged Euler’s borrowing capability to mint 195M eDAI and 200M dDAI.
  4. Repaid 10M debt to mint more eDAI, holding 215M eDAI and 190M dDAI.
  5. Repeated step 4, increasing holdings to 410M eDAI and 390M dDAI.
  6. Invoked the donateToReserves() function to donate 100M eDAI.
function donateToReserves(uint256 amount) external {
    // Missing liquidity check allows exploit
    // Function logic here
}

During this process, the attacker’s health factor was not verified, allowing liquidation of their own position to gain profit. The attacker liquidated themselves, extracting 38M eDAI, and repaid the flashloan.

The exploit was a flash loan attack exploiting a business logic vulnerability in the smart contract.

Get Started with Phalcon Security

Detect every threat, alert what matters, and block attacks.

Try now for free

Summary

The core issue was the missing liquidity check in the donateToReserves() function combined with a dynamic liquidation discount mechanism. This created an arbitrage opportunity, enabling the attacker to exploit a large amount of crypto assets without proper collateral or debt repayment.

Follow-up Steps

Remarkably, approximately $135 million of the stolen funds—mainly staked Ether (stETH), Bitcoin, and stablecoins like DAI and USDC—were fully recovered. The attacker was a 19-year-old Argentine named Federico Jaime, who returned all stolen assets three weeks later for moral reasons.[1]

BlockSec has been actively monitoring the incident. Our official Twitter accounts @BlockSecTeam and @MetaSleuth provided continuous updates. On March 18, 2023, the attacker returned 3,000 Ether, followed by 51,000 Ether a week later, with remaining funds returned in subsequent days.

During the refund process, phishing scams emerged exploiting the incident. Fraudsters created a phishing site, eulerrefunds.cxx, tricking some users.

MetaSleuth, BlockSec’s high-performance cross-chain fund flow analytics tool, enabled near real-time tracking of affected digital assets during the attack and refund phases.

Explore MetaSleuth Investigation

Trace flows and build evidence for investigations

Try now for free

More on Blockchain Security

This case is one of many illustrating the critical need for robust blockchain security. BlockSec offers comprehensive security services for blockchain projects, including:

  • Smart Contract Audits during development to identify vulnerabilities.
  • Phalcon Security, a SaaS platform providing incident alerts and automatic blocking to prevent crypto hacks.
  • MetaSleuth, for enhanced traceability and transparency of digital assets.
  • Infrastructure Audits to secure the underlying blockchain environment.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch


Reference

[1] HE STOLE $200 MILLION. HE GAVE IT BACK. NOW, HE’S READY TO EXPLAIN WHY

Sign up for the latest updates
COLDCARD Incident: When a Wallet's "Random" Seed Wasn't Random
Security Insights

COLDCARD Incident: When a Wallet's "Random" Seed Wasn't Random

A silent build-and-integration bug in COLDCARD firmware routed Bitcoin seed generation onto a software RNG fallback, whose weak randomness left wallet seeds recoverable offline. Because the weakness is in the seed itself, a firmware update cannot undo it; verified sweeps reached 1,405 BTC (~$91M) by 7 August 2026, with private-channel estimates as high as 2,055 BTC.

~$88M Lost: COLDCARD & LULA Exploits | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$88M Lost: COLDCARD & LULA Exploits | BlockSec Weekly

During the week of July 27 to August 2, 2026, two notable security incidents caused roughly $88M in losses across Bitcoin and BNB Chain. The highlighted COLDCARD incident was a hardware-wallet firmware entropy failure: a build guard that checked whether an RNG configuration macro existed rather than whether it was enabled routed seed generation to a deterministic software fallback, enabling an attacker to recover affected seeds and sweep at least 1,370 BTC (~$88M) across a series of on-chain waves. The LULA token on BNB Chain lost ~$578K to a business-logic flaw where an attacker-reachable path could trigger its privileged `recycle()` function, pulling LULA out of a PancakeSwap V2 pair, resyncing its reserves to the manipulated balance, and draining its liquidity.

Newsletter - July 2026
Security Insights

Newsletter - July 2026

July 2026's three largest DeFi incidents totaled approximately $67.9M in losses across Arbitrum and Solana. AFX Trade lost ~$24.15M after a supply chain attack compromised validator signing authority. Ostium's OLP vault was drained of ~$23.75M through compromised oracle infrastructure that submitted attacker-controlled prices. BonkDAO lost ~$20M when an attacker spent $4.4M to acquire enough voting power to pass a malicious treasury transfer with no timelock. All three incidents demonstrate that a protocol's security boundary extends far beyond smart contract code.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch. Aligned with the highest industry security standards.

BlockSec Audit