Back to Blog

DeFi Exploit Analysis: The Root Cause of Euler's $200M Loss

Code Auditing
March 13, 2023
3 min read
Key Insights

On March 13, 2023, Euler Finance, a decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocol on Ethereum, experienced a flash loan attack resulting in losses of approximately $200 million. The root cause was identified as the absence of a liquidity check in the donateToReserves() function. As a blockchain security company, BlockSec continuously monitors such exploits to improve DeFi security and protect digital assets.

Date Attack Type Chain Lost Recovered
2023-03-13 Business Logic Flaw ETH ~$200M Yes

Euler Finance was ranked among the top 30 DeFi protocols on DefiLlama before the attack. Its total value locked (TVL) dropped dramatically from $264 million to $10 million, a 96% decline.

Key Concepts

Understanding Euler Finance’s self-borrow and soft liquidation mechanisms is essential to grasp the exploit:

  • Self-borrow: Allows users to mint new assets and increase debt by using newly minted EToken as collateral, effectively enabling leverage.
  • Soft liquidation: Permits liquidators to repay debt flexibly for the liquidated party, rather than using a fixed liquidation coefficient.

These mechanisms, while innovative, introduced exploitable vulnerabilities that the attacker leveraged.

Attack Analysis

The attacker executed the exploit through the following steps:

  1. Flashloaned 30M DAI from AAVE.
  2. Deposited 20M DAI into Euler Finance and received 20M eDAI.
  3. Leveraged Euler’s borrowing capability to mint 195M eDAI and 200M dDAI.
  4. Repaid 10M debt to mint more eDAI, holding 215M eDAI and 190M dDAI.
  5. Repeated step 4, increasing holdings to 410M eDAI and 390M dDAI.
  6. Invoked the donateToReserves() function to donate 100M eDAI.
function donateToReserves(uint256 amount) external {
    // Missing liquidity check allows exploit
    // Function logic here
}

During this process, the attacker’s health factor was not verified, allowing liquidation of their own position to gain profit. The attacker liquidated themselves, extracting 38M eDAI, and repaid the flashloan.

The exploit was a flash loan attack exploiting a business logic vulnerability in the smart contract.

Get Started with Phalcon Security

Detect every threat, alert what matters, and block attacks.

Try now for free

Summary

The core issue was the missing liquidity check in the donateToReserves() function combined with a dynamic liquidation discount mechanism. This created an arbitrage opportunity, enabling the attacker to exploit a large amount of crypto assets without proper collateral or debt repayment.

Follow-up Steps

Remarkably, approximately $135 million of the stolen funds—mainly staked Ether (stETH), Bitcoin, and stablecoins like DAI and USDC—were fully recovered. The attacker was a 19-year-old Argentine named Federico Jaime, who returned all stolen assets three weeks later for moral reasons.[1]

BlockSec has been actively monitoring the incident. Our official Twitter accounts @BlockSecTeam and @MetaSleuth provided continuous updates. On March 18, 2023, the attacker returned 3,000 Ether, followed by 51,000 Ether a week later, with remaining funds returned in subsequent days.

During the refund process, phishing scams emerged exploiting the incident. Fraudsters created a phishing site, eulerrefunds.cxx, tricking some users.

MetaSleuth, BlockSec’s high-performance cross-chain fund flow analytics tool, enabled near real-time tracking of affected digital assets during the attack and refund phases.

Explore MetaSleuth Investigation

Trace flows and build evidence for investigations

Try now for free

More on Blockchain Security

This case is one of many illustrating the critical need for robust blockchain security. BlockSec offers comprehensive security services for blockchain projects, including:

  • Smart Contract Audits during development to identify vulnerabilities.
  • Phalcon Security, a SaaS platform providing incident alerts and automatic blocking to prevent crypto hacks.
  • MetaSleuth, for enhanced traceability and transparency of digital assets.
  • Infrastructure Audits to secure the underlying blockchain environment.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch


Reference

[1] HE STOLE $200 MILLION. HE GAVE IT BACK. NOW, HE’S READY TO EXPLAIN WHY

Sign up for the latest updates
~$15.9M Lost: Trusted Volumes & More | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$15.9M Lost: Trusted Volumes & More | BlockSec Weekly

This BlockSec bi-weekly security report covers 11 notable attack incidents identified between April 27 and May 10, 2026, across Sui, Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, Blast, and Berachain, with total estimated losses of approximately $15.9M. Three incidents are analyzed in detail: the highlighted $1.14M Aftermath Finance exploit on Sui, where a signed/unsigned semantic mismatch in the builder-fee validation allowed an attacker to inject a negative fee that was converted into positive collateral during settlement; the $5.87M Trusted Volumes RFQ authorization mismatch on Ethereum; and the $5.7M Wasabi Protocol infrastructure-to-contract-control compromise across multiple EVM chains.

Newsletter - April 2026
Security Insights

Newsletter - April 2026

In April 2026, the DeFi ecosystem experienced three major security incidents. KelpDAO lost ~$290M due to an insecure 1-of-1 DVN bridge configuration exploited via RPC infrastructure compromise, Drift Protocol suffered ~$285M from a multisig governance takeover leveraging Solana's durable nonce mechanism, and Rhea Finance incurred ~$18.4M following a business logic flaw in its margin-trading module that allowed circular swap path manipulatio

~$7.04M Lost: GiddyDefi, Volo Vault & More | BlockSec Weekly
Security Insights

~$7.04M Lost: GiddyDefi, Volo Vault & More | BlockSec Weekly

This BlockSec weekly security report covers eight attack incidents detected between April 20 and April 26, 2026, across Ethereum, Avalanche, Sui, Base, HyperLiquid, and MegaETH, with total estimated losses of approximately $7.04M. The highlighted incident is the $1.3M GiddyDefi exploit, where the attacker did not break any cryptography or use a flash loan but simply replayed an existing on-chain EIP-712 signature with the unsigned `aggregator` and `fromToken` fields swapped out for a malicious contract, demonstrating how partial signature coverage turns any historical signature into a generic permit. Other incidents include a $3.5M Volo Vault operator key compromise on Sui, a $1.5M Purrlend privileged-role takeover, a $413K SingularityFinance oracle misconfiguration, a $142.7K Scallop cross-pool index injection, a $72.35K Kipseli Router decimal mismatch, a $50.7K REVLoans (Juicebox) accounting pollution, and a $64K Custom Rebalancer arbitrary-call exploit.

Best Security Auditor for Web3

Validate design, code, and business logic before launch. Aligned with the highest industry security standards.

BlockSec Audit