Back to Blog

BTC Cross-Chain Monitoring & Chainlink PoR API: Setting a New Standard for BTCFi Security

Phalcon
January 10, 2025

The year 2024 can rightly be seen as the inaugural year of BTCFi. While Bitcoin’s market cap surpassed the trillion-dollar mark back in 2021, the development of DeFi within the Bitcoin ecosystem lagged behind other blockchains. For much of its history, Bitcoin was primarily regarded as a store of value, often left dormant in cold wallets.

However, early 2024 marked a turning point. BRC20, ARC20, and Rune assets sparked significant interest, and Bitcoin Layer-2 solutions experienced explosive growth. By May, the rise of Bitcoin staking led to the emergence of a growing number of BTC-wrapped assets, unlocking Bitcoin's liquidity. This shift expanded opportunities for Bitcoin holders, enabling greater liquidity, enhanced utility, and access to higher yields—all of which quietly laid the foundation for BTCFi.

The use of BTC-wrapped assets in staking, lending, and cross-chain arbitrage presents the potential for substantial returns. However, these opportunities also bring risks. The question arises: what are the security risks associated with BTC-wrapped assets?

1 Depegging Risk

BTC-wrapped assets must maintain a 1:1 or greater BTC reserve ratio to ensure user confidence, making transparency in reserve assets crucial. Many projects now publish proof of reserves (PoR) on their official websites, which is a positive step. However, some only disclose total reserves without sharing the addresses list, while others may not update their PoR timely, making it harder for users to verify the data.

Projects like WBTC and FBTC enhance transparency by publishing their PoR through Chainlink, a relative more objective way that involves independent third-party verification of reserve data.

➡️ BlockSec Solution: Address Ownership Verification API

BlockSec provides an Address Ownership Verification API that enables projects to conduct PoR on third-party platforms. This solution has been adopted by various projects. For example, FBTC leverages the API as its data source to publish PoR on the Chainlink platform in a transparent, automated, and real-time manner.

FBTC PoR_Source: Chainlink 🔗 https://data.chain.link/feeds/ethereum/mainnet/fbtc-por#operator-galaxy

➡️ BlockSec Solution: Reserve Ratio Monitoring

Thanks to the monitoring capabilities of BlockSec Phalcon, we are able to offer the PoR API. Phalcon facilitates real-time monitoring of asset movements and constructs an address relationship network for precise verification. It allows for accurate tracking of both the quantities of underlying assets and BTC-wrapped assets across various networks.

Furthermore, Phalcon not only verifies the quantities of assets but also sends immediate alerts and triggers automated responses when the amount of locked BTC falls below the combined total of wrapped assets across different blockchains. This proactive approach effectively mitigates the risk of de-pegging.

2 Cross-chain Risks

In the mapping and creation process of cross-chain assets, vulnerabilities are often exploited. For example, after a user initiates a deposit transaction on the Bitcoin network, the amount of locked BTC does not change, yet BTC-wrapped assets are successfully minted on the target chain. How can cross-chain transactions be monitored in real-time to preemptively address such risks?

➡️ BlockSec Solution: Cross-Chain Monitoring

BlockSec Phalcon supports real-time monitoring and automatic reconciliation of all cross-chain transactions. Beyond the fake deposit issue mentioned above, it also manages scenarios including arbitrary minting, double-spending, inconsistencies in deposit amounts, and delays in cross-chain minting/withdrawal, etc. Upon detecting any anomalies, alerts are promptly sent through selected channels to the relevant personnel, and simultaneous automated response measures are triggered to prevent potential losses.

In traditional cross-chain monitoring solutions, losses may have already occurred by the time a depegging event is detected. However, Phalcon offers more granular monitoring configurations, backed by a team with the expertise to address all risk points and execute the necessary customized developments. This capability enables real-time monitoring of cross-chain processes, ensuring immediate detection of Burn/Lock transactions on the source chain or Mint transactions on the target chain.

In our collaborations with FBTC, the Phalcon team has consistently showcased our ability to swiftly identify risks, offer monitoring recommendations, and develop cross-chain monitoring solutions that precisely meet their requirements.

3 Contract Risks

The security of contracts on other chains that utilize BTC-wrapped assets for cross-chain and wrapping operations is crucial. Although these contracts typically undergo code audits, they may still harbor zero-day vulnerabilities, along with risks introduced during dynamic processes such as bug fixes, contract upgrades, and configuration modifications.

➡️ BlockSec Solution: Contract Monitoring

BlockSec Phalcon conducts real-time monitoring of transactions as early as the Mempool stage. By analyzing over 200 clearly defined attack characteristics, it detects attack transactions and promptly generates countermeasures. It implements a front-running strategy to ensure that the system-generated response transactions are prioritized on the blockchain over the attack transactions, effectively blocking attacks and achieving zero losses.

BlockSec Phalcon Monitoring Templates
BlockSec Phalcon Monitoring Templates

Beyond attack risks, Phalcon also covers operational risks, interaction risks, and financial risks, providing comprehensive security protection for protocols.

4 Contact Us

BlockSec Phalcon is an invitation-only SaaS platform, accessible only to invited users. Interested users can schedule a demo to learn more about the product's features, and have the opportunity to discuss customized security solutions with our security experts.

Sign up for the latest updates
Tether Freezes $6.76M USDT Linked to Iran's IRGC & Houthi Forces: Why On-Chain Compliance is Now a Geopolitical Battlefield
Security Insights

Tether Freezes $6.76M USDT Linked to Iran's IRGC & Houthi Forces: Why On-Chain Compliance is Now a Geopolitical Battlefield

Looking ahead, targeted freezing events like this $6.76M USDT action will only become more common. On-chain data analysis is improving. Stablecoin issuers are also working closely with regulators. As a result, hidden illicit financial networks will be exposed.

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Mar 2 – Mar 8, 2026
Security Insights

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Mar 2 – Mar 8, 2026

During the week of March 2 to March 8, 2026, seven blockchain security incidents were reported with total losses of ~$3.25M. The incidents occurred across Base, BNB Chain, and Ethereum, exposing critical vulnerabilities in smart contract business logic, token deflationary mechanics, and asset price manipulation. The primary causes included a double-minting logic flaw during full token deposits that allowed an attacker to exponentially inflate their balances through repeated burn-and-mint cycles, a price manipulation vulnerability in an AMM-based lending market where artificially inflated vault shares created divergent price anchors to incorrectly force healthy positions into liquidation, and a flawed access control implementation relying on trivially spoofed contract interfaces that enabled attackers to bypass authorization to batch-mint and dump arbitrary tokens.

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Feb 23 – Mar 1, 2026
Security Insights

Weekly Web3 Security Incident Roundup | Feb 23 – Mar 1, 2026

During the week of February 23 to March 1, 2026, seven blockchain security incidents were reported with total losses of ~$13M. The incidents affected multiple protocols, exposing critical weaknesses in oracle design/configuration, cryptographic verification, and core business logic. The primary drivers included oracle manipulation/misconfiguration that led to the largest loss at YieldBloxDAO (~$10M), a crypto-proof verification flaw that enabled the FOOMCASH (~$2.26M) exploit, and additional token design and logic errors impacting Ploutos, LAXO, STO, HedgePay, and an unknown contract, underscoring the need for rigorous audits and continuous monitoring across all protocol layers.