background
logo

Security Audit Report for Halo

DESCRIPTION

Halo is a social monetization platform for the AI era. Earn passive rewards from posts, transactions, and engagements with 1M+ pioneers.

The core contracts covered in this audit include the halo-token-earn-contract and HaloMem- bershipPass.sol of Halo. The iterative audit covers the code in the initial version, as well as subsequent versions to fix discovered issues, as detailed in our audit report. Please note that external dependencies are assumed reliable and are therefore excluded from the audit scope.

Our audit methodology employs automated vulnerability scans, manual verification, and business logic analysis to uncover potential security issues coupled with gas and code quality optimization recommendations.

In summary, we have found that the codebase contains one high-risk issue that require prompt attention. In addition, we have identified other non-critical issues as well as security suggestions that should be considered. The Halo team has addressed these issues promptly. It is important to note that our audit covers only the final reported versions of the codebase. Any subsequent updates would require a re-evaluation.

KEY FINDINGS

In total, we find 4 potential issues in the smart contract. We also have 3 recommendations and 3 notes, as follows:

High Risk: 1
Medium Risk: 0
Low Risk: 3
Recommendation: 3
Note: 3
ID Severity Description Category Status
1 Low Potential loss of influencer airdrop in function setInfluencerInfos() DeFi Security Confirmed
2 Low Configuration overwrites and lack of validations in function setAirdropDetail() DeFi Security Confirmed
3 Low Potential incorrect reward distribution in function updateRewardRate() DeFi Security Confirmed
4 High Reuse of AdminSig enables upgrading multiple NFTs of users DeFi Security Fixed
5 - Lack of comparison check in function setJustClaimPct() Recommendation Confirmed
6 - Lack of non-zero check for key parameters Recommendation Confirmed
7 - Lack of check in function setClaimStartAt() Recommendation Confirmed
8 - Potential centralization risk Note -
9 - HGP burn verification reliance on off-chain mechanisms Note -
10 - Potential unavailability of claimRewardsAndStake() function due to StakeToken and RewardToken inconsistency Note -

More details are provided in the audit report.

Take the first step towards a secure future

Reach out now for BlockSec's expert code audit services, elevate the security of your protocol before it goes live!